Posted in

Exclusive-Jet engine maker CFM studies plan B for next fuel-saving design, sources say

Exclusive-Jet engine maker CFM studies plan B for next fuel-saving design, sources say


By Tim Hepher

PARIS, Feb 12 (Reuters) – French-US jet engine maker CFM is studying a more conventional “advanced ducted” engine design alongside its preferred option ‌for a radical open-fan concept for future jets, as the industry debates ‌fuel-savings and lower emissions, industry sources said.

The venture co-owned by GE Aerospace and France’s Safran has ​been championing an open-rotor engine, featuring a large exposed fan instead of a traditional casing, as the most efficient and environmentally friendly architecture for the next series of Airbus and Boeing jets.

It says this would generate fuel and emissions savings of 20% ‌under a widely publicised research ⁠programme called RISE.

But it is also looking in a more structured way than previously reported at a design where the fan ⁠would be contained inside a shell similar to casings on current engines. Experts say such designs save less fuel but can be more adaptable.

The choice of technologies has potential ​implications not ​only for the efficiency of aircraft entering ​service around 2040, but the ‌commercial strategies of Airbus and Boeing.

The project to study the alternative architecture came to light in a Safran employee’s job description seen by Reuters.

The employee’s duties include work on future civil and defence projects, including the “Open Fan” and a separate, unpublicised project called “Advanced Ducted-Large” or ADL.

Three industry sources confirmed that CFM is working on “advanced ‌ducted” architecture under RISE, which targets a cluster ​of technologies ahead of any specific engine design.

Safran ​and GE both declined to comment. ​The French company is due to report earnings on Friday.

CFM ‌and its two shareholders have consistently ​said they are ready ​to provide whatever engines planemakers want and have never ruled out choosing a more conventional design, even as they tout the benefits of the open-bladed ​architecture.

But the emergence of ‌a separate code name is the first tangible sign that the alternative ​engine design is being taken seriously enough to warrant standalone attention.

(Reporting ​by Tim Hepher; Editing by Bernadette Baum)



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *