Network News Global

Where Every Story Matters

Polymarket users stand to make millions if US troops enter Iran, raising insider trading fears
Business & Economy

Polymarket users stand to make millions if US troops enter Iran, raising insider trading fears


The “U.S. forces enter Iran by” contract on Polymarket (1) has attracted more than $99.9 million in trading volume since it launched in January — and as of Thursday morning, the market currently assigns a 62% probability that American troops will set foot on Iranian territory by April 30. Among the traders positioning for that outcome is at least one account that stands to collect a seven-figure payout if it happens.

If the name of this game sounds familiar, it should. Just weeks ago, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps flagged six freshly created Polymarket accounts (2) that collectively netted roughly $1.2 million by correctly betting the U.S. would strike Iran on February 28 — the exact day (3) coordinated U.S.-Israeli airstrikes began. Most of those wallets were funded within 24 hours of the attack, and their bets were placed hours before the first bombs fell.

One account alone turned roughly $61,000 into more than $493,000 in profit (4), according to CoinDesk. A separate account trading under the name “Magamyman” earned more than $553,000 betting on the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei (5) shortly before an Israeli strike killed him, according to NPR.

Then there’s the trader CNN identified (6), with the help of Bubblemaps, who won 93% of their five-figure wagers on Iran since 2024, netting nearly $967,000 — even though the events they predicted were unannounced military operations. Todd Phillips, a finance professor at Georgia State University and former Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) advisory board member, told CNN the win rate was a red flag, adding most high-frequency traders hover just above 50%.

Prediction markets work like stock markets, except what you’re buying and selling are contracts tied to real-world events rather than company earnings. You purchase “yes” or “no” shares at a price that reflects the crowd’s estimated probability. If you’re right, each share pays out $1. If you’re wrong, you lose your stake.

The model has legitimate applications. Proponents argue these markets aggregate dispersed information more effectively than polls or pundits can. But when the event being traded on is a military operation — planned in secret and executed without public warning — the pool of people who could reasonably “predict” it narrows considerably.



Source link

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *